In Re Iniybong Ebong--Appeal from 351st District Court of Harris County

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 13, 2011 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-00745-CR IN RE INIYBONG EBONG, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 351st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1286755 MEMORANDUM OPINION On August 29, 2011, relator Iniybong Ebong filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov t Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Mark Ellis, presiding judge of the 351st District Court of Harris County to rule on his pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus. Consideration of a motion that is properly filed and before the court is a ministerial act. State ex rel. Curry v. Gray, 726 S.W.2d 125, 128 (Tex. Crim. App.1987) (orig. proceeding). A relator must establish the trial court (1) had a legal duty to rule on the motion; (2) was asked to rule on the motion; and (3) failed to do so. In re Keeter, 134 S.W.3d 250, 252 (Tex. App. Waco 2003, orig. proceeding). A relator must show that the trial court received, was aware of, and was asked to rule on the motion. In re Villarreal, 96 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. App. Amarillo 2003, orig. proceeding). Relator did not attach a file-stamped copy of his pretrial application demonstrating it is actually pending in the trial court. Relator has not established entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. He has not provided this court with a record showing that the 351st District Court received the application for writ of habeas corpus, was aware of it, was asked to rule on it, and refused to rule. Accordingly, we deny relator s petition for writ of mandamus PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Frost, Seymore, and Jamison. Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.