In Re Joseph Liddel Poysinger--Appeal from 228th District Court of Harris County

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed August 23, 2011. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-00694-CR IN RE JOSEPH LIDDEL POYSINGER, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 228th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1218874 MEMORANDUM OPINION On August 15, 2011, relator Joseph Liddel Paysinger filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov t Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Marc Carter, presiding judge of the 228th District Court of Harris County to rule on his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. Consideration of a motion that is properly filed and before the court is a ministerial act. State ex rel. Curry v. Gray, 726 S.W.2d 125, 128 (Tex. Crim. App.1987) (orig.proceeding). A relator must establish the trial court (1) had a legal duty to rule on the motion; (2) was asked to rule on the motion; and (3) failed to do so. In re Keeter, 134 S.W.3d 250, 252 (Tex. App. Waco 2003, orig. proceeding). A relator must show that the trial court received, was aware of, and asked to rule on the motion. In re Villarreal, 96 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. App. Amarillo 2003, orig. proceeding). Relator did not attach a file-stamped copy of his motion demonstrating it is actually pending in the trial court. Relator has not established entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. He has not provided this court with a record showing that the 228th District Court received the motion for judgment nunc pro tunc, was aware of it, was asked to rule on it, and refused to rule. Accordingly, we deny relator s petition for writ of mandamus PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Frost, Seymore, and Jamison. Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.