In Re Jerry Ricky Hannah--Appeal from 174th District Court of Harris County

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 24, 2011 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-00201-CR IN RE JERRY RICKY HANNAH, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS MEMORANDUM OPINION On March 9, 2011, relator Jerry Ricky Hannah filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov t Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Ruben Guerrero, presiding judge of the 174th District Court of Harris County to vacate relator s conviction. Relator was convicted for failure to comply with a civil commitment order. This court affirmed his conviction. Hannah v. State, 14-09-00283-CR; 2010 WL 1790807 (Tex. App. Houston [14th Dist.] May 6, 2010, pet. ref d) (memo. op.). This court s original jurisdiction is governed by section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code. Section 22.221 expressly limits the original jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to: (1) writs against a district court judge or county court judge in the court of appeals district, and (2) all writs necessary to enforce the court of appeals jurisdiction. Tex. Gov t Code Ann. § 22.221. The substance of the relief sought by relator in his petition is habeas corpus relief following a final felony conviction. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 841.045(b) (offense under this section is a felony of the third degree). Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides the exclusive means to challenge a final felony conviction. Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). Such an application for writ of habeas corpus is returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals. The court of appeals does not have jurisdiction. Id. Accordingly, we dismiss relator s petition for lack of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Seymore, and McCally. Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.