Joshua Deangelo Cassaro v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 174th District Court of Harris County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 25, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-10-00013-CR ____________ JOSHUA DEANGELO CASSARO, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 174th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1219422 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant entered a guilty plea to assault causing bodily injury to a family member. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, on June 19, 2009, the trial court deferred a finding of guilt and placed appellant on community supervision for four years and assessed a $100 fine. The State subsequently moved to adjudicate appellant s guilt, and appellant entered a plea of true. On December 15, 2009, the trial court adjudicated appellant s guilt and sentenced him to confinement for two years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and assessed a $100 fine. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. The trial court entered a certification of the defendant s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court s certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). In a plea-bargain case for deferred adjudication community supervision, the plea bargain is complete at the time the defendant enters his plea of guilty in exchange for deferred adjudication community supervision. Hargesheimer v. State, 182 S.W.3d 906 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). As part of appellant s agreement to plead true, he expressly waived any right to appeal with the understanding that the State would recommend a two-year sentence and a $100 fine. A waiver of the right to appeal, negotiated in exchange for a specified punishment, will prevent a defendant from appealing without the consent of the trial court. See Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 617 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Therefore, because appellant has no right of appeal in this case, we need not request correction of the trial court s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Christopher. Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
