In the Interest of P.R.G a child--Appeal from 308th District Court of Harris County

Annotate this Case
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 5, 2007

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 5, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-01105-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF P.R.G., a Child

On Appeal from the 308th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2005-30425

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment terminating the parental rights of appellant, Yeyde Anton, signed December 6, 2006. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on December 8, 2006. The appellate filing fee was not paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 5; see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals, Misc. Docket No. 98-9120 (Tex. Jul. 21, 1998); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005). On January 4, 2007, appellant was sent the requisite ten-days= notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Appellant filed no reply, and to date, the filing fee has not been paid.


In addition, the record in this appeal has not been filed. On February 21, 2007, the court reporter for this case informed that the court that payment arrangements had not been made for preparation of the reporter=s record. On March 14, 2007, the clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that the trial court denied appellant=s request to proceed without the advance payment of costs, and that appellant had not made arrangements to pay for the record. On March 15, 2007, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court=s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant filed no response.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed April 5, 2007.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Hudson and Guzman.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.