Bedwell, Steven Lewis v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 23rd District Court of Brazoria County

Annotate this Case
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 10, 2005

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 10, 2005.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-05-00493-CR

____________

STEVEN LEWIS BEDWELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 23rd District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 39,741

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

After a guilty plea, appellant was convicted of driving while intoxicated and placed on community supervision for ten years. On February 25, 2005, the State filed its amended motion to revoke appellant=s probation. After hearing evidence, the trial court found two of the allegations in the motion true. On March 23, 2005, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for ten years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.[1] Appellant filed a written notice of appeal.


Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. More than sixty days have elapsed, and to date, no motion to review the record or pro se response has been filed.

We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the State.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed November 10, 2005.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Anderson.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).


[1] Appellant was also convicted of driving while intoxicated in cause number 45,893. His appeal of that conviction remains pending before this court under our cause number 14-05-00494-CR.