Nolan, David Glenn v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 183rd District Court of Harris County
Annotate this CaseAffirmed and Opinion filed July 18, 2002.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NOS. 14-01-01014-CR &
14-01-01016-CR
____________
DAVID GLENN NOLAN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
_______________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 183rd District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 863,157 & 862,773
_______________________________________________________
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant entered pleas of guilty to two counts of impersonating a public servant. The jury sentenced appellant to confinement for ten years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and a ten thousand dollar fine on each count. Appellant filed pro se notices of appeal.
Appellant s appointed counsel filed briefs in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), by presenting a professional
evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel s brief in each cause number was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the records and counsel s briefs and agree that the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the records. A discussion of the briefs would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Opinion filed July 18, 2002.
Panel consists of Justices Hudson, Fowler, and Edelman.
Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.3(b).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.