In re Ronald Newell and Jody McBride Appeal from 190th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Opinion issued April 28, 2022 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00238-CV ——————————— IN RE RONALD NEWELL AND JODY MCBRIDE, Relators Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relators, Ronald Newell and Jody McBride, have filed a petition for a writ of mandamus requesting that this Court “direct[] the [trial court] to vacate [its] [o]rder of February 22, 2022” granting the “Traditional Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to the Effectiveness of the Receiver’s Proxy” of real parties in interest, Jacob Anslum, Jill Anslum, Dustin Dittman, and Slegte Hond, LLC.1 1 The underlying case is Pathfinder Services, LLC v. Jacob Anslum, Jill Anslum, and Dustin Dittman v. Slegte Hond, LLC v. Jody A. McBride, Ronald Newell, and David We deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Countiss and Farris. A. Fettner, Cause No. 2021-50845, in the 190th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Beau A. Miller presiding. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.