Katherine Matson v. Willie Turner Appeal from 333rd District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued August 16, 2022 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00177-CV ——————————— KATHERINE MATSON, Appellant V. WILLIE TURNER, Appellee On Appeal from the 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2017-09131 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Katherine Matson appeals from the trial court’s December 7, 2021 final judgment. Appellant has not paid for the clerk’s record or the required filing fee and has not established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1 (indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158. Appellant failed to respond to our notices of March 31, 2022 (past due filing fee) and April 7, 2022 (non-payment for the clerk’s record), that, should appellant not pay the fee for the clerk’s record or the filing fee or establish indigence, this appeal was subject to dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). Appellant has not responded to this Court’s notices. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Countiss, and Rivas-Molloy. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
