In re Chandler Appeal from 61st District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued March 8, 2022 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00687-CV ——————————— IN RE CHANDLER, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Chandler1 filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the granting by Respondent, The Honorable Fredericka Phillips, of Real Party in Interest Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London Subscribing to Certificate No. B1230GP04015A19’s Motion to Dismiss Chandler’s claims against it pursuant to a 1 According to his petition, Relator was born Richard Chandler but legally changed his name to Chandler. forum selection clause.2 Chandler contends enforcement of the forum selection clause is “unjust, unreasonable, or . . . the contractual forum would be seriously inconvenient for trial.” We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. All pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Landau, Hightower, and Rivas-Molloy. 2 The underlying case is Chandler v. Jim Braniff III, Aaron D. Isgur, USI Insurance Services, Inc., Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London on Certificate No. B1230GP04015A19, THB International, Inc., and Hiscox, Inc., Cause No. 202055018, pending in the 61st District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Fredericka Phillips presiding. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
