Bahaeddin Shabaneh M.D. v. Guilda Rangel, Guardian of the person Alfredo Rangel, Ward, an Incapacitated person and Ashley Guerrero, as next friend for XXXXX, a minor Appeal from Probate Court of Galveston County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued September 10, 2020 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00410-CV ——————————— BAHAEDDIN SHABANEH, MD, INPATIENT PHYSICIAN’S ASSOCIATES, PLLC, AND BAY AREA INPATIENT GROUP, PA, Appellants V. GUDELIA RANGEL, GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON ALFREDO RANGEL, WARD, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON, AND ASHLEY GUERRERO, AS NEXT FRIEND FOR XXXXX, A MINOR, Appellees On Appeal from the Probate Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Case No. PR0077218-A MEMORANDUM OPINION On May 11, 2020, appellant Bahaeddin Shabaneh, MD filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s April 21, 2020 interlocutory order overruling “Defendants Bay Area Inpatient Group, PA, Inpatient Physician’s Associates, PLLC and Bahaeddin Shabaneh, MD’s objections to Plaintiffs’ Expert Report of Daniel Munoz, M.D.” That same day, appellants Inpatient Physician’s Associates, PLLC (“Inpatient Physician’s”) and Bay Area Inpatient Group, PA (“Bay Area”) also filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s April 21, 2020 interlocutory order. On August 25, 2020, Shabaneh filed an unopposed motion to dismiss his appeal, representing to this Court that subsequent trial court orders had rendered his appeal of the trial court’s April 21, 2020 interlocutory order moot. That same day, Inpatient Physician’s and Bay Area also filed an unopposed motion to dismiss their appeal, representing to the Court that appellees, Gudelia Rangel, guardian of the person Alfredo Rangel, ward, an incapacitated person, and Ashley Guerrero, as next friend for XXXXX, a minor, filed a motion for nonsuit, dismissing their claims against Inpatient Physician’s and Bay Area, rendering their appeal of the trial court’s April 21, 2020 interlocutory order moot. No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Accordingly, we grant the motions and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1); 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Lloyd, and Landau. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
