Jamie Lee Hood-Crossland v. Michael Ray Crossland Appeal from 309th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Opinion issued August 30, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00569-CV ——————————— JAMIE LEE HOOD-CROSSLAND, Appellant V. MICHAEL RAY CROSSLAND, Appellee On Appeal from the 309th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2016-68169 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Jamie Lee Hood-Crossland has neither established indigence nor paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Caughey. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.