Rita Lemons v. Don Trustclaire; Doin Blake; Carlos Pena; Noe Gomez; Latecia Gomez; Berthel Martinez Appeal from 240th District Court of Fort Bend County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Opinion issued April 10, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00042-CV ——————————— RITA LEMONS, Appellant V. DON TRUSTCLAIRE; DOIN BLAKE; CARLOS PENA; NOE GOMEZ; LATECIA GOMEZ; AND BERTHEL MARTINEZ, Appellees On Appeal from the 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 14-DCV-213790 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Rita Lemons, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a) (West 2013), 101.041 (West Supp. 2016); Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Bland, Lloyd, and Caughey. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.