Shawn Bulent Butler v. The State of Texas Appeal from 178th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued August 28, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00016-CR ——————————— SHAWN BULENT BUTLER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 178th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1479420 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Shaun Bulent Butler, pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon with an agreement from the State to cap punishment at 30 years’ imprisonment. In accordance with the terms of this plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to 15 years’ imprisonment. Appellant filed a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An agreement placing a cap on punishment is a plea bargain for purposes of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Wilson v. State, 264 S.W.3d 104, 108 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.); Waters v. State, 124 S.W.3d 825, 826–27 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref’d). Because the record shows that appellant agreed to the State’s recommendation of a cap of 30 years on sentencing, this is a plea bargain case under Rule 25.2(a)(2) and appellant has no right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2) An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal and states that appellant waived the right of appeal. The record contains plea papers signed by appellant showing that he agreed to waive his right to appeal in exchange for the plea agreement capping his sentence at 30 years’ imprisonment. The record thus 2 supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez, 183 S.W.3d at 680 (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Lloyd. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
