Zsolt Petko and Zsuzsanna Adam v. Carelton Courtyard Appeal from County Court at Law No 2 of Galveston County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued April 3, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00918-CV ——————————— ZSOLT PETKO AND ZSUZSANNA ADAM, Appellants V. CARELTON COURTYARD, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV-0077741 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants, Zsolt Petko and Zsuzsanna Adam, proceeding pro se, have neither paid nor made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record and have not established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1, 37.3(b). After being notified by this Court’s February 14, 2018 Order and Notice of Intent to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution that this appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to pay the required clerk’s record fee, appellants failed to timely respond. See id. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to pay the required clerk’s record fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Higley. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
