Dawn M. Coulson v. Leslie Kiefer Amann, Dependent Administrator with Will Annexed of the Estate o robert C. Keifer, Deceased and as President of Walden Technology, Inc. Appeal from Probate Court No 2 of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Opinion issued July 19, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00721-CV ——————————— DAWN M. COULSON, Appellant V. LESLIE KIEFER AMANN, DEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR WITH WILL ANNEXED OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT C. KIEFER, DECEASED AND AS PRESIDENT OF WALDEN TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 424,767-401 MEMORANDUM OPINION The parties, representing that they have entered into a settlement agreement and the probate court has granted their motion to approve the agreement, have filed a joint motion to reinstate and dismiss the appeal with prejudice. No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal, grant the parties’ motion to “reinstate and dismiss the appeal with prejudice,” and dismiss the appeal with prejudice. See id. 42.1(a); 43.2(f). However, we deny the parties’ request that the “Court not tax costs against Appellant or Appellee.” See id. 43.4. And we tax the costs of the appeal against the party incurring same. See id; see, e.g., TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (Vernon 2013) (requiring court of appeals clerk to collect certain fees). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Lloyd.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.