Meir Afuta v. Cargo Design Appeal from Co Civil Ct at Law No 2 of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued February 1, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00666-CV ——————————— MEIR AFUTA, Appellant V. CARGO DESIGN, Appellee On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1078202 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Meir Afuta, has neither paid the required filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.851(b), 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West 2016); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Further, appellant has neither paid nor made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified by the Clerk of this Court on September 14, 2017, that this appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to pay the required filing fee, and again on September 29, 2017, that this appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to pay the required clerk’s record fee, appellant failed to timely respond. See id. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to pay all required fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Bland. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
