In re George Horace Richardson Appeal from 176th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued July 7, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00465-CR ——————————— IN RE GEORGE HORACE RICHARDSON, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, George Horace Richardson, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to rule on his motion for new trial.1 A motion for new trial is overruled by operation of law if 1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. George Horace Richardson, Cause No. 1417213, in the 176th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Stacey Bond presiding. the trial court does not rule on the motion within seventy-five days after suspending or imposing sentence in open court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.8. Accordingly, relator has not demonstrated entitlement to mandamus relief. We deny the petition. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Lloyd. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
