Prateek Jain v. Sarika Samantha Wadhawan Appeal from 312th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Opinion issued May 17, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00043-CV ——————————— PRATEEK JAIN, Appellant V. SARIKA SAMANTHA WADHAWAN, Appellee On Appeal from the 312th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2015-22704 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Prateek Jain, has neither established indigence, nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See id. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Huddle. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.