Reverend Stinal Sti Atkins v. Bernard Schultz, Schultz & Schultz, Rodrigo Suarez Rodas, Joseph Benard Schultz, and Baur, Bergstorm & Winter LLP Appeal from 165th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Opinion issued April 28, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00957-CV ——————————— STINAL STI ATKINS, Appellant V. BERNARD SCHULTZ, SCHULTZ & SCHULTZ, RODRIGO SUAREZ RODAS, JOSEPH BENARD SCHULTZ, AND BAUR, BERGSTORM & WINTER LLP, Appellees On Appeal from the 165th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2013-31227 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Stinal Sti Atkins, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a) (West 2013), 101.041 (West Supp. 2015); Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c). We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes and Higley. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.