David Rodriguez v. James Stafford Appeal from 295th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued October 4, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00602-CV ——————————— DAVID RODRIGUEZ, Appellant V. JAMES STAFFORD, Appellee On Appeal from the 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-64247 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, David Rodriguez, proceeding pro se, appealed from the trial court’s order granting the appellee’s motion for summary judgment, signed on June 15, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). However, appellant has neither paid nor made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record and he has not established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1, 37.3(b). After being notified by this Court’s Order and Notice of Intent to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution on August 16, 2016, that this appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to pay the required clerk’s record fee, appellant did not timely respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). CONCLUSION Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Brown. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
