In re Ernest Ray Koonce Appeal from 127th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued April 26, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00440-CV ——————————— IN RE ERNEST RAY KOONCE, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Ernest Ray Koonce, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s February 17, 2015 order granting a new trial in the underlying proceeding.1 1 The underlying case is Koonce v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2005, Asset Backed PassThrough Certificates, Series 2005-WHQ2, cause number 2010-64752, pending in the 127th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Hon. R.K. Sandhill presiding. After reviewing relator’s petition and supplemental petition for writ of mandamus and the response of the real party in interest, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2005, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-WHQ2, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes and Higley. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
