Ernest Ray Koonce v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2005, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-WHQ2 Appeal from 127th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Opinion issued April 26, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00228-CV ——————————— ERNEST RAY KOONCE, Appellant V. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE UNDER THE POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT DATED AS OF APRIL 1, 2005, ASSET BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-WHQ2, Appellee On Appeal from the 127th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2010-64752 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Ernest Ray Koonce, is attempting to appeal the trial court’s February 17, 2015 order granting a new trial in the underlying case. This Court has jurisdiction to hear an interlocutory appeal only if authorized by statute. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014 (West Supp. 2015); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001); Stary v. DeBord, 967 S.W.2d 352, 352–53 (Tex. 1998). An order granting a new trial is an interlocutory order that generally is not reviewable on direct appeal, except under very limited circumstances not applicable here. See Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys., 160 S.W.3d 559, 563 (Tex. 2005). On April 14, 2015, appellee filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has not produced a record demonstrating that this Court has jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes and Higley. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.