In re Mother Doe and Father Doe, Individually and as Next Friends of John Doe and Jane Doe Appeal from Co Civil Ct at Law No 2 of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued August 27, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00692-CV ——————————— IN RE MOTHER DOE AND FATHER DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS OF JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE, Relators Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relators, Mother Doe and Father Doe, Individually and as Next Friends of John Doe and Jane Doe, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus, arguing that the trial court1 abused its discretion when it granted the real party in interest’s Motion to Strike Adult Plaintiffs’ Use of Pseudonyms. 1 The respondent is the Honorable Theresa Chang of the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County. The underlying suit is Mother Doe and Father Doe, We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We further deny the real party in interest’s motion for sanctions. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle. Individually and as Next Friends of John Doe and Jane Doe v. Beth Yeshurun Day School, No. 1045092 (County Civil Court at Law No. 2., Tex.). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
