Carolyn Johnson-Thomas v. Ezra Thomas, III Appeal from 310th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Opinion issued October 29, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00007-CV ——————————— CAROLYN JOHNSON-THOMAS, Appellant V. EZRA THOMAS, III, Appellee On Appeal from the 310th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014-00630 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Carolyn Johnson-Thomas, proceeding pro se, appealed from the trial court’s final decree of divorce, signed on December 31, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). However, appellant has neither paid the required filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See id. at 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West 2013), §101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After this Court’s Order and Notice of Intent to Dismiss, issued on April 9, 2015, notified appellant that her appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to pay the filing fee, appellant failed to timely respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for nonpayment of the required filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.