Lakeisha Scott v. The State of Texas Appeal from 263rd District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued December 1, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-01031-CR ——————————— LAKEISHA SCOTT, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 263rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1387553 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, LaKeisha Scott, pleaded guilty to the first-degree felony offense of injury to a child—serious bodily injury, with the agreed recommendation that she receive five years’ confinement. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§ 22.04(a)(1), (e) (West Supp. 2014). On August 23, 2013, the trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at five years’ confinement, in accordance with the terms of her plea bargain with the State. The trial court certified that this is a plea-bargain case and that appellant has no right of appeal. Nevertheless, appellant untimely filed a pro se notice of appeal on December 10, 2014. The trial court appointed Marcus J. Fleming as appellant’s appellate counsel, who filed a motion to withdraw with an Anders brief stating that the record presents no non-frivolous issues or reversible error and that, therefore, this appeal is without merit and frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Appellant has not filed any response to her counsel’s Anders brief. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. In a criminal case, an appeal is perfected by timely filing a sufficient notice of appeal with the trial clerk to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (b). A criminal defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after the day the trial court enters an appealable order, if the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522–23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to 2 address the merits of the appeal. See Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210. Here, the trial court signed the judgment on August 23, 2013, and imposed the sentence on that date. Appellant did not timely file a motion for new trial or extension of time to file a notice of appeal, making her notice of appeal due by September 23, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1), 26.3. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until December 10, 2014, more than fifteen months after the judgment was signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Thus, under these circumstances, we can take no action other than to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 526. CONCLUSION Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.1 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley, Huddle, and Lloyd. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 1 Attorney Marcus J. Fleming must immediately send the required notice and file a copy of that notice with the Clerk of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(c). Appointed counsel still has a duty to inform appellant of the result of this appeal and that she may, on her own, pursue discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
