J. James Raymond v. Joseph Degioanni, Emtel, Inc., and Brazos Emergency Physicians Association, P.A., The Methodist Hospital, The Methodist Health Care Centers d/b/a Methodist Sugar Land Hospital and Methodist Willowbrook, Neptune Emergency Physician Services, P.A., et al. Appeal from 334th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued October 14, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00459-CV J. JAMES RAYMOND, Appellant V. JOSEPH DEGIOANNI, EMTEL, INC., AND BRAZOS EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS ASSOCIATION, P.A., THE METHODIST HOSPITAL, THE METHODIST HEALTH CARE CENTERS D/B/A METHODIST SUGAR LAND HOSPITAL AND METHODIST WILLOWBROOK, NEPTUNE EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, P.A., PATRICK G. WOODS, M.D., DIANA FITE, M.D., NEPTUNE EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, P.A., JOHN E. BUCK, M.D., STEVE MATTI, M.D., DANIEL MAO, M.D., LEEOR B. PELEG, D.O., ERIC SCHROEDER, M.D., DAN BURIAN, M.D., AND GEORGE SIMONS, D.O., Appellees/Cross-Appellants On Appeal from the 334th Judicial District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2003-53712 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, J. James Raymond, has filed an agreed motion to dismiss this appeal and all cross-appeals after settling the case, and requests that all costs be assessed against the party incurring the same. The parties further request that this Court dissolve its June 12, 2014 Order that had stayed the trial court s May 30, 2014 Order Granting Joint Motion for Court Approval of Settlement and Denying Receiver s Motion for Release of Funds to Pay Receivership Fees. This motion was signed by appellees and cross-appellants counsel, no other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1), (c). Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal and all crossappeals, with costs to be taxed against the party who incurred the same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (d), 43.2(f). We further lift the stay imposed by our June 12, 2014 Order. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
