Karey B Statin v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company Appeal from 190th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued October 7, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00142-CV KAREY B. STATIN, Appellant V. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the 190th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2013-23471 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Karey Bernard Statin attempts to appeal an order granting a lien foreclosure application filed by appellee pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 736. On April 30, 2014, we sent appellant a notice of intent to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction because such orders are not reviewable by appeal. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 736.8(c) (order granting or denying foreclosure application under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 736 is not subject to a motion for rehearing, new trial, bill of review, or appeal. ). We informed appellant that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless he filed a response demonstrating that this Court has jurisdiction over this appeal Appellant failed to file an adequate response. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 736.8(c); Thweatt v. Deutsche Bank Nat l Trust Co., No. 01 14 00261 CV, 2014 WL 2538691, at *1 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] June 5, 2014, no pet.) (dismissing appeal of Rule 736 order for lack of jurisdiction); Johnson v. Residential Funding Real Estate Holdings, LLC, No. 01 10 00287 CV, 2011 WL 2418516, at *1 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] May 26, 2011, no pet.) (same). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
