Mario Elliott Young v. The State of TexasAppeal from 239th District Court of Brazoria County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued July 24, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00009-CR MARIO ELLIOTT YOUNG, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 239th District Court1 Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 69418 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Mario Elliott Young, timely appealed from his conviction for aggravated assault. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. ยง 22.02(a)(2) (West Supp. 2011). 1 Counsel for Appellant: Phillip Morin Counsel for Appellee: Travis Townsend, Brazoria DA's office Trial court Judge: Hon. Patrick Sebesta When no brief was timely filed, we abated the case for a trial court hearing to determine indigence matters and appointment of counsel on appeal. On April 14, 2014, the court reporter filed a transcript of the abatement hearing held April 11, 2014. During the hearing, Young indicated he does not wish to pursue his appeal: THE COURT: Do you still wish to pursue your appeal in this case? THE DEFENDANT: Not in that matter, no, sir. THE COURT: Pardon? THE DEFENDANT: Not in that matter, no, sir. THE COURT: Okay. Then I think that makes the other questions moot. You understand you do have the right to continue with your appeal? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. THE COURT: All right. And you re telling me that at least this appeal that s been initiated pursuant under this cause number that s in the First Court of Appeals in Houston right now, you don t wish to continue that appeal. Is that right? THE DEFENDANT: That s correct, sir. Although an updated certification of appellant s right to appeal was not filed with the supplemental record, the appellant clearly waived his right to appeal on the record. A valid waiver of appeal prevents a defendant from appealing without the trial court s consent. Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). A waiver of appeal made after sentence is imposed is valid. See Monreal, 99 S.W.3d at 618, 622; Moreno v. State, 327 S.W.3d 267, 268 69 (Tex. App. San Antonio 2010, no pet.); Delatorre v. State, 957 S.W.2d 145, 149 (Tex. App. Austin 1997, pet. ref d). 2 Here, the record reflects that appellant waived the right to appeal after his sentence was imposed. Because appellant waived his right of appeal after his sentence was imposed, he has no right of appeal, and we must dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss all pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
