Rose Air, LLC v. Brazoria County Appraisal District and Cheryl Evans, in her Capacity as Chief AppraiserAppeal from 412th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued June 5, 2014. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-13-01085-CV ROSE AIR, LLC, Appellant V. BRAZORIA COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT AND CHERYL EVANS, IN HER CAPACITY AS CHIEF APPRAISER, Appellees On Appeal from the 412th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 71172 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Rose Air, LLC, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV T CODE ANN. ยงยง 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), 101.0411 (West Supp. 2013); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c). Additionally, on March 25, 2014, this Court granted appellant s counsels motion to withdraw. Because a corporation may be represented only by a licensed attorney in the prosecution of its appeal, appellant was required to retain licensed counsel if it desired to prosecute its appeal. See MHL Homebuilder LLC v. Dabal/Graphic Resource, No. 14-05-00295-CV, 2005 WL 1404475, at *1 (Tex. App. Houston [14th Dist.] June 16, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.) (citing Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., U.S.A., 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex.1996) and Dell Dev. Corp. v. Best Indus. Uniform Supply Co., 743 S.W.2d 302, 303 (Tex. App. Houston [14th Dist.] 1987, writ denied)). We ordered that any new counsel representing appellant in this appeal file a designation of lead counsel or notice of appearance with the Clerk of this Court by April 14, 2014, and notified appellant that if no such designation or notice was filed, the Court might dismiss the appeal. No such designation or notice has been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot. 2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Sharp, and Huddle. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
