Daniel Baires v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 263rd District Court of Harris County (original memorandum per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Opinion issued August 9, 2012 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-12-00306-CR ____________ DANIEL BAIRES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 263rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1286904 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Daniel Baires, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of sexual assault of a child.1 The trial court found appellant guilty and, in accordance with the terms of appellant s plea agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to 1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.011(a)(2)(c) (West 2011). confinement for five. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal. In a plea-bargained case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court s permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 2006); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Here, the trial court s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id. The trial court s certification states that this is a plea-bargained case and the defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) ( A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal. ). 2 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss all pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.