Santos Almanzar v. The State of Texas
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
No. 1-11-01058-CR FILED IN In the First Court of Appeals *£!£££** At Houston, Texas JAN 0 4 2013 Santos Almanzar, IV MKAH1NNEMcCUU.0ugh CLERK. V. The State of Texas APPELLANT'SMOTION FOR EXTENSION IN WHICH TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Unopposed) To the Honorable First Court of Appeals: 1. This honorable court handed down its opinion, affirming, on December 20, 2012. Any motion for rehearing would be due to be filed on or before Friday, January 4, 2013. 2. The undersigned counsel will continue to represent Appellant Almanzar in State Appellate Courts. 3. This counsel for Almanzar requests an extension of three weeks to and including Friday, January 25, 2013. 4. Good cause exists for such extension: 5. Aside from holiday commitments over December 21-25, this counsel has been ill and not effectively working during the remainder of December. Medical treatment was required. 6. This counsel is presently occupied in completing a Brief in No. 14-1200690, Ricardo Torres v. The State of Texas, in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals. This Brief is due January 14, 2013 on its first extension. Accordingly, Appellant Almanzar requests that the deadline for filing any motion for rehearing or Request for Rehearing En Banc be extended to and including Friday, January 25, 2013. Respectfully submitted, Mark W. Stevens Email: markwandstev@sbcglobaI.net TBN 19184300 P.O. Box 8118 Galveston, Texas 77553 409.765.6306 Fax 409.765.6469 Counsel for Appellant Certificate of Conference The foregoing motion was discussed via email on January 3, 2013 with Rebecca Klaren, ADA, and Ms. Klaren advises that the State has no objection. Mark W. Stevens Certificate of Service The foregoing motion was faxed to ADA Rebecca Klaren 409.766.2290 on January 3, 2013. Mark W. Stevens Mark W. Stevens Attorney at Law P.O. Box 8118 galveaton, Texas 77553-8118 M, Karinne McCullouch, Clerk First Court of Appeals 301 Fannin Houston, TX 77002 v, I ... ¢
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
