In re Thomas Freeman--Appeal from 178th District Court of Harris County (per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Opinion issued October 12, 2011 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-11-00818-CR IN RE THOMAS FREEMAN, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Thomas Freeman, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. GOV T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b) (Vernon 2004); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1. Relator contends that the trial court erred when it failed to address [his] plea to its jurisdiction and when it continued to press forward to trial date without resolving the jurisdiction question. 1 Relator requests this Court to order the trial court to follow the law or in the alternative, [to] rule that [the trial court] does not have jurisdiction over [relator] and that all the charges against him should be dismissed. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Massengale. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 1 Respondent is The Honorable David Mendoza, presiding judge of the 178th District Court of Harris County, Texas. The underlying suit is The State of Texas v. Thomas Freeman, No. 1280765 in the 178th District Court of Harris County, Texas, The Hon. David Mendoza, presiding. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.