Prairie View A & M University v. Dr. Barbara Pleasant--Appeal from 9th District Court of Waller County
Annotate this CaseOpinion issued July 12, 2007
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
NO. 01-06-00403-CV
__________
PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY, Appellant
V.
DR. BARBARA PLEASANT, Appellee
On Appeal from the 9th District Court
Waller County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 04-04-17281
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Prairie View A&M University ("PVAMU"), brings an accelerated interlocutory appeal (1) challenging the trial court's order granting appellee, Dr. Barbara Pleasant's, motion for reconsideration of its ruling on PVAMU's amended plea to the jurisdiction.
On October 30, 2006, we ordered the appeal abated and remanded the case to the trial court for a period of thirty days to permit the parties to obtain an order that "grant[ed] or denie[d] a plea to the jurisdiction by a governmental unit as that term is defined in Section 101.001." See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. 51.014(8) (Vernon Supp. 2006); see also Tex. R. App. P. 27.2. We further ordered that, if such an order was signed by the trial court, a supplemental clerk's record containing the order was to be filed with the clerk of this Court.
On November 29, 2006, a supplemental clerk's record was filed containing an order granting PVAMU's plea to the jurisdiction and dismissing Pleasant's suit in its entirety. On May 24, 2007, we reinstated the case.
On June 13, 2007, PVAMU filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for mootness, noting that it did not want to pursue this appeal because all relief it had prayed for had been granted by the trial court. Pleasant has not filed a response to this motion. We agree that the trial court's November 27, 2006 order granting PVAMU's plea to the jurisdiction and dismissing Pleasant's suit in its entirety renders PVAMU's appeal in this case moot.
Accordingly, we order that this appeal is dismissed as moot.
Terry Jennings
Justice
Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Jennings, and Higley
1. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. 51.014(a)(8) (Vernon Supp. 2006).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.