In Re: Joe Lee Gill--Appeal from 263rd District Court of Harris County
Annotate this CaseOpinion issued September 20, 2002
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-02-00990-CV
____________
IN RE JOE LEE GILL, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court compel respondent (1) to dismiss his court-appointed counsel in cause number 912838, and appoint new counsel. The petition states that cause number 912838 is presently scheduled for trial on October 14, 2002.
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. The petition does not meet the requirements of Rule 52 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.
Even if it did, one of the prerequisites for the issuance of a writ of mandamus by an appellate court is that the lower court must have a legal duty to perform a nondiscretionary act. Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). A trial court has no duty to search for counsel agreeable to a defendant. King v. State, 29 S.W.3d 556, 566 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).
The petition for writ of mandamus is therefore denied.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Taft, Alcala, and Price. (2)
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
1. Respondent is the Honorable Jim Wallace, Judge, 263rd District Court, Harris County.
2. The Honorable Frank C. Price, former Justice, Court of Appeals, First District of Texas at Houston, participating by assignment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.