In Re: Daniel J. Moos Appeal from 160th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

DENIED and Opinion Filed August 14, 2023 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00567-CV IN RE DANIEL J. MOOS, Relator Original Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-17668 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Smith, and Kennedy Opinion by Justice Kennedy Before the Court is relator’s June 7, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus. Relator asks this Court to compel the trial court to (1) vacate its May 12, 2023 order denying relator’s motion to disburse funds from the registry of the court and (2) order that the interpleaded funds be immediately paid to relator. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). /Nancy Kennedy/ NANCY KENNEDY JUSTICE 230567F.P05 –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.