Jarrick Ryan Crowe v. The State of Texas Appeal from 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 11, 2022 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00430-CR No. 05-22-00431-CR No. 05-22-00432-CR No. 05-22-00433-CR JARRICK RYAN CROWE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. W15-34070-A, W15-34078-A, W15-34079-A & W15-76048-A MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Pedersen, III, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness On April 26, 2022, Jarrick Ryan Crowe filed his notices of appeal in the Dallas County District Clerk’s office, seeking to challenge the trial court’s April 8, 2022 findings of fact and conclusions of law on his applications for Article 11.07 writs of habeas corpus. The notices were forwarded to this Court. A court of appeals may review appeals only when authorized by law. Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696–97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). An applicant imprisoned after final conviction for a felony offense who desires to apply for habeas relief must do so under article 11.07 of the code of criminal procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, §§ 1, 3; Bd. of Pardons and Paroles ex rel. Keene v. The Eighth Court of Appeals, 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (orig. proceeding). This Court is not authorized by law to review the trial court’s determinations on an article 11.07 writ application. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(b) (providing writ of habeas corpus filed after final conviction of felony for which death penalty is not imposed must be filed with trial court clerk and writ of habeas corpus is returnable to court of criminal appeals); Keene, 910 S.W.2d at 483; see also Ex parte Wicker, No. 02-18-00318-CR, 2018 WL 4140642, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Aug. 30, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing appeal of trial court’s order recommending denial of article 11.07 writ application). Because we have no jurisdiction to review the trial court’s determinations on appellant’s article 11.07 applications for writ of habeas corpus, we dismiss these appeals. /Robbie Partida-Kipness/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 220430F.U05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT JARRICK RYAN CROWE, Appellant No. 05-22-00430-CR On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. W15-34070A. Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness. Justices Pedersen, III and Nowell participating. V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. Judgment entered this 11th day of May 2022. –3– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. W15-34078A. Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness. Justices Pedersen, III and Nowell participating. JARRICK RYAN CROWE, Appellant No. 05-22-00431-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. Judgment entered this 11th day of May 2022. –4– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. W15-34079A. Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness. Justices Pedersen, III and Nowell participating. JARRICK RYAN CROWE, Appellant No. 05-22-00432-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. Judgment entered this 11th day of May 2022. –5– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. W15-76048A. Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness. Justices Pedersen, III and Nowell participating. JARRICK RYAN CROWE, Appellant No. 05-22-00433-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. Judgment entered this 11th day of May 2022. –6–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.