In Re: Chuan Chen and M. Tayari Garrett Appeal from 192nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Deny and Opinion Filed February 25, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00140-CV IN RE CHUAN CHEN AND M. TAYARI GARRETT, Relators Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-17249 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III Before the Court are relators’ February 22, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on our review of the petition and record, we conclude relators have failed to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We deny relators’ motion for emergency stay as moot. Page 1 of 2 220140f.p05 /Bill Pedersen, III// BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.