Maurice Hooker v. Arnold Verbeek Appeal from 298th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 7, 2022 In the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00088-CV MAURICE HOOKER, Appellant V. ARNOLD VERBEEK, Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-20523 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Carlyle, Smith, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Carlyle Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal because they have settled their dispute. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). 220088f.p05 /Cory L. Carlyle// CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MAURICE HOOKER, Appellant No. 05-22-00088-CV On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-20523. Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle. Justices Smith and Garcia participating. V. ARNOLD VERBEEK, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that appellee ARNOLD VERBEEK recover his costs of this appeal from appellant MAURICE HOOKER. Judgment entered this 7th day of April, 2022. –2–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
