In Re Danielle Sposito Appeal from 417th Judicial District Court of Collin County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Deny and Opinion issued March 22, 2022 In the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-01171-CV IN RE DANIELLE SPOSITO, Relator Original Proceeding from the 417th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 417-53396-2018 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Carlyle Before the Court are relator’s January 19, 2022 redacted petition for writ of mandamus and the record filed in support; December 30, 2021 and January 31, 2022 emergency motions for temporary relief; February 7, 2022 motion for appointment of a new judge in her Collin County Case and accompanying emergency motion for temporary relief; and March 10, 2022 emergency motion to expedite petition of writ of mandamus and appointment of a new trial court judge. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that she lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on our review of the petition and record, we conclude relator has failed to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We deny relator’s pending motions. 211171f.p05 /s/Cory L. Carlyle_____ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.