Regional Electric Products Corporation v. Metalurgica Schulz, S. A. Appeal from 134th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 7, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-87-00492-CV REGIONAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Appellant V. METALURGICA SCHULZ, S. A., Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 83-4824-G MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Myers We reinstate this appeal. In 1987, we abated this case due to bankruptcy. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. The Court conducted an independent review of the federal Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system which does not show a pending bankruptcy case associated with this appeal. We notified the parties by letter, requesting they inform the Court of the status of the bankruptcy and of this appeal. We cautioned that the failure to respond would result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b),(c). To date, neither party has responded. Because we gave the parties an opportunity to show why we should not dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and no one responded, we dismiss this appeal. See id. 42.3(b),(c); Brewer v. Admiral Ins. Co., 2002 WL 31312990, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 16, 2002, no writ) (per curiam) (not designated for publication). /Lana Myers// 870492f.p05 LANA MYERS JUSTICE –2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT REGIONAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Appellant No. 05-87-00492-CV On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 83-4824-G. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices Partida-Kipness and Garcia participating. V. METALURGICA SCHULZ, S. A., Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. Judgment entered this 7th day of June, 2021. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.