Colleen Crawford v. McKinney Millennium II, LP, individually and d/b/a Post Oak Apartments, Alpha-Barnes Real Estate Services, LLC, individually and d/b/a Post Oak Apartments and Alpha-Barnes Real Estate Services II, LLC, individually and d/b/a Post Oak Apartments Appeal from 471st Judicial District Court of Collin County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00391-CV COLLEEN CRAWFORD, Appellant V. MCKINNEY MILLENNIUM II LP, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A POST OAK APARTMENTS, ALPHA BARNES REAL ESTATE SERVICES, LLC, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A POST OAK APARTMENTS, AND ALPHABARNES REAL ESTATE SERVICES II, LLC, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A POST OAK APARTMENTS, Appellees On Appeal from the 471st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 471-02495-2020 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Reichek Opinion by Justice Osborne By motion filed October 25, 2021, appellant informs the Court that the parties have settled the case, and she requests the appeal be dismissed. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). 210391f.p05 /Leslie Osborne// LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT COLLEEN CRAWFORD, Appellant No. 05-21-00391-CV On Appeal from the 471st Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 471-024952020. Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne, Justices Pedersen, III and Reichek participating. V. MCKINNEY MILLENNIUM II LP, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A POST OAK APARTMENTS, ALPHA BARNES REAL ESTATE SERVICES, LLC, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A POST OAK APARTMENTS, AND ALPHABARNES REAL ESTATE SERVICES II, LLC, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A POST OAK APARTMENTS, Appellees In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. As agreed by the parties, we ORDER that each party bear its own costs of this appeal. Judgment entered this 4th day of November, 2021. –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.