In Re Kenneth L. Buholtz Appeal from County Court at Law No. 6 of Collin County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

DENY and Opinion Filed July 26, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00254-CV IN RE KENNETH L. BUHOLTZ, Relator Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 6 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006-01691-2018 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Goldstein Opinion by Justice Goldstein Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus challenges various discovery rulings and the denial of his motion to transfer the case. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Because relator has not submitted an adequate record, we are unable to conduct a meaningful review of his claims. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(1). Accordingly, we deny the petition without prejudice to refiling a record that complies with the Texas rules of appellate procedure. Also before the Court is relator’s motion to transfer records. We deny the motion. /Bonnie Lee Goldstein/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE 210254F.P05 –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.