Haxan Waldell Palmer v. The State of Texas Appeal from 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 8, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00046-CR No. 05-21-00084-CR HAXAN WALDELL PALMER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F18-58281-T & F18-58280-T MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Reichek On December 10, 2020, Haxan Waldell Palmer filed a pro se notice of appeal with the Dallas County District Clerk for both of the above appeals. In the notice, he stated he was appealing his October 4, 2019 convictions. On January 21, 2021, he filed a “Notice of Appeal Bond Hearing” in appellate cause number 05-21-00046CR, asking for an appeal bond. A defendant perfects his appeal by timely filing a written notice of appeal with the trial court clerk. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(b), (c). To be timely, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the date sentence was imposed or within ninety days after sentencing if the defendant timely filed a motion for new trial. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). In the absence of a timely perfected notice of appeal, the Court must dismiss the appeal. Ex parte Castillo, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012); Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (per curiam). In these cases, the trial court entered judgment on October 4, 2019. Although appellant filed motions for new trial, they were untimely; therefore, his notice of appeal was due on November 4, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 26.2(a)(1). Because it was filed on December 10, 2020, after the time provided by the rules of appellate procedure, his appeals are untimely, and we lack jurisdiction over these cases. We also note that after appellant, who was represented by counsel, was found guilty by a jury, he entered into negotiated plea bargains with the State regarding punishment. Under the plea agreements, appellant agreed to waive his right to appeal in exchange for the State’s agreement to recommend punishment of seven years in prison in each case. See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The trial court followed the punishment plea agreement, assessed punishment at seven years in prison in each case, and prepared and signed rule 25.2(d) certifications of appellant’s right to appeal stating “the defendant has waived his right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). –2– Under these circumstances, we have no alternative other than to dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We deny any outstanding motions. /Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 210046F.U05 –3– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F18-58281-T. Opinion delivered by Justice Reichek. Justices Molberg and Nowell participating. HAXAN WALDELL PALMER, Appellant No. 05-21-00046-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. Judgment entered February 8, 2021 –4– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F18-58280-T. Opinion delivered by Justice Reichek. Justices Molberg and Nowell participating. HAXAN WALDELL PALMER, Appellant No. 05-21-00084-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. Judgment entered February 8, 2021 –5–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
