Retail Services WIS Corporation d/b/a Product Connections, John Jason Gramling, Nathan Stout, Amanda Villa, Katherine Palmer, Casey King, and James Rose v. Crossmark, Inc. Appeal from 429th Judicial District Court of Collin County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed September 21, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-01054-CV RETAIL SERVICES WIS CORPORATION D/B/A PRODUCT CONNECTIONS, JOHN JASON GRAMLING, NATHAN STOUT, AMANDA VILLA, KATHERINE PALMER, CASEY KING, AND JAMES ROSE, Appellants V. CROSSMARK, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-05122-2020 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Smith Opinion by Justice Molberg Before the Court is appellants’ unopposed voluntary motion to dismiss, which asks that we dismiss the appeal, with costs to be borne by each party as incurred by them, pursuant to a settlement agreement reached between the parties. The motion also asks that we lift the stay imposed by our March 10, 2021 order so the parties can dismiss the underlying litigation. We grant appellants’ motion, lift the temporary stay imposed by our May 10, 2021 order, and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Subject to any agreement between the parties, each party will bear its own costs of appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, our mandate will issue forthwith. 201054f.p05 /Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE –2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT RETAIL SERVICES WIS CORPORATION D/B/A PRODUCT CONNECTIONS, JOHN JASON GRAMLING, NATHAN STOUT, AMANDA VILLA, KATHERINE PALMER, CASEY KING, AND JAMES ROSE, Appellants No. 05-20-01054-CV On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-051222020. Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg. Justices Goldstein and Smith participating. V. CROSSMARK, INC., Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that each party to bear its own costs of the appeal. Judgment entered this 21st day of September, 2021. –3–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
