Jane Doe v. Billy Jack Williams Appeal from 429th Judicial District Court of Collin County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 20, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00965-CV JANE DOE, Appellant V. BILLY JACK WILLIAMS, Appellee On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-03946-2019 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein Opinion by Chief Justice Burns At issue in this interlocutory appeal is the trial court’s granting of appellee’s motion to dismiss appellant’s negligence claim for failure to serve the expert report required in a health care liability claim.1 See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 74.351(a) (requiring report), (b) (providing for dismissal of claim where report not served). The appeal was filed pursuant to Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code sections 51.014(a)(9), which authorizes an appeal from an interlocutory order 1 The trial court denied the motion as to appellant’s claims for assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress. denying in whole or in part a motion to dismiss for failure to serve an expert report, and (a)(10), which authorizes an appeal from an interlocutory order granting a motion challenging the adequacy of an expert report. See id. §§ 51.014(a)(9),(10). Because an appeal from an interlocutory order may only be taken if authorized by statute, see Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.3d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992), and neither of the relied upon sections nor any other statute appeared to authorize this appeal, we questioned our jurisdiction over the appeal. At our direction, the parties filed letter briefs addressing our concern. Appellant asserts generally in her letter brief that the appeal is authorized because the negligence claim is not a health care liability claim and therefore, a report was not required and the dismissal was improper. Our jurisdiction over an appeal, however, does not arise because the trial court may have committed error. Rather, in the context of an appeal from an interlocutory order, it is conferred by statute. See id. The only interlocutory order granting a motion in a health care liability claim that is authorized by statute to be appealed is an order granting a motion challenging the adequacy of an expert report. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a) & (a)(10). The order here is not such an order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). 200965F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT JANE DOE, Appellant No. 05-20-00965-CV On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-039462019. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating. V. BILLY JACK WILLIAMS, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. We ORDER that appellee Billy Jack Williams recover his costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Jane Doe. Judgment entered April 20, 2021 –3–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
