David Joachim v. Friedman & Feiger, L.L.P. Appeal from 160th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 24, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00694-CV DAVID JOACHIM, Appellant V. FRIEDMAN & FEIGER, L.L.P., Appellee On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-13421 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Reichek We reinstate this appeal. In August 2019, we abated this case due to the suggestion of bankruptcy filed by Joachim. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. An independent review of the federal Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system shows no pending bankruptcy proceeding associated with this appeal. We notified the parties by letter dated May 7, 2021, requesting they inform the Court of the status of this appeal. When no one responded, we then sent a second letter, dated July 21, 2021, informing the parties that the appeal would be reinstated and dismissed for want of prosecution within ten days unless we heard from either party. See id. 42.3(b),(c). To date, no party has responded. Because we gave the parties an opportunity to show why we should not dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and no one responded, we dismiss this appeal. See id. 42.3(b), (c); Gibbs v. Bank One, Tex., 2021 WL 1747855, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 4, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op.). /Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE 190694F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT DAVID JOACHIM, Appellant No. 05-19-00694-CV On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-13421. Opinion delivered by Justice Reichek. Justices Schenck and Carlyle participating. V. FRIEDMAN & FEIGER, L.L.P., Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee FRIEDMAN & FEIGER, L.L.P. recover its costs of this appeal from appellant DAVID JOACHIM. Judgment entered August 24, 2021 –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.