Stephen Holloway and all other occupants v. Pinwell Investments LLC Appeal from County Court at Law No. 3 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 11, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01389-CV STEPHEN HOLLOWAY AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellant V. PINWELL INVESTMENTS LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-04637-C MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Schenck We reinstate this appeal. In 2014, we abated this case due to bankruptcy. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. The Court conducted an independent review of the federal Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system which shows the bankruptcy case associated with this appeal was terminated on June 1, 2018, effectively dissolving the automatic stay. We notified the parties by letter, requesting they inform the Court of the status of the bankruptcy and of this appeal. We cautioned that the failure to respond would result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b),(c). To date, neither party has responded. Because we gave the parties an opportunity to show why we should not dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and no one responded, we dismiss this appeal. See id. 42.3(b),(c); Brewer v. Admiral Ins. Co., 2002 WL 31312990, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 16, 2002, no writ) (per curiam) (not designated for publication). /David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE 131389F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT STEPHEN HOLLOWAY AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellant No. 05-13-01389-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-04637C. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck. Justices Reichek and Carlyle participating. V. PINWELL INVESTMENTS LLC, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. Judgment entered May 11, 2021 –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.