Maria Sustaita Larkin v. Eduardo A. Salinas Appeal from 116th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed November 5, 2020 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00207-CV MARIA SUSTAITA LARKIN, Appellant V. EDUARDO A. SALINAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-17533 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Whitehill, Pedersen, III, and Reichek Opinion by Justice Reichek Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. After appellant failed to respond to our request regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record and appellant’s brief to be filed by September 17, 2020. By postcard dated September 21, 2020, we notified appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed a brief, filed an extension motion, nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c). /Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE 200207F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-17533. Opinion delivered by Justice Reichek. Justices Whitehill and Pedersen, III participating. MARIA SUSTAITA LARKIN, Appellant No. 05-20-00207-CV V. EDUARDO A. SALINAS, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee EDUARDO A. SALINAS recover his costs of this appeal from appellant MARIA SUSTAITA LARKIN. Judgment entered November 5, 2020 –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.