In Re: Reginald Arleigh Noble Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 4 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 23, 2019 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01521-CV IN RE REGINALD ARLEIGH NOBLE, Relator Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F00-50025-K MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Evans Opinion by Justice Evans Relator Reginald Arleigh Noble filed a petition for writ of quo warranto in this Court, see TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1, claiming Criminal District Court No. 4 lacked jurisdiction to convict him in 2000 for aggravated sexual assault of a child under 14 years of age and asking this Court to grant him a new trial. Noble was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to life in prison. His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. See Noble v. State, No. 08-01-00035CR, 2002 WL 221886 (Tex. App.—El Paso Feb. 4, 2002, pet. ref'd) (not designated for publication). A writ of quo warranto is an extraordinary remedy used for raising certain actions against private corporations and railroad companies as well as raising questions concerning the proper person entitled to hold a public office and exercise its functions. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 66.001; see State ex rel. Angelini v. Hardberger, 932 S.W.2d 489, 490 (Tex. 1996); Save Our Springs All., Inc. v. Lazy Nine Mun. Util. Dist. ex rel. Bd. of Directors, 198 S.W.3d 300, 310 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2006, pet. denied). Quo warranto proceedings are brought in the name of the State by the Attorney General or the proper district or county attorney. Robinson v. Neeley, 192 S.W.3d 904, 909 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2006, no pet.). Noble’s petition complains that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to convict him; he does not raise an issue for which a writ of quo warranto is available. Therefore, quo warranto is an improper vehicle for obtaining the relief he seeks. Furthermore, the writ power of this Court is limited to issuing writs of mandamus and all other writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction, which does not include a writ of quo warranto. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a). The Texas Supreme Court, not the courts of appeals, is vested with the power to issue writs of quo warranto. TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.002(a); see TEX. CONST. art. V, § 3. We do not have original jurisdiction over proceedings seeking a writ of quo warranto. Finally, even if we broadly construed Noble’s filing, there is no substance presented in support of his often repeated conclusory statement that Criminal District Court No. 4 lacked jurisdiction to convict him for aggravated sexual assault of a child under 14 years of age and then sentence him to life in prison. We dismiss Noble’s petition for lack of jurisdiction. 191521F.P05 /David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE –2–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
